BackChocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG Overview

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG Receivables

Track Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG's receivables ($660M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$657.58M
20.79% YoYΔ $113.18M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG Receivables History

Loading

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG (COCXF) FAQ

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG posts a receivables of $660M as of June 2026. That compares with $540M in the prior-year period — up 20.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG's receivables was $540M. The latest reading is $660M — a 20.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG's financial statement story. At $660M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for COCXF's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $660M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.