BackSema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) Overview

Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) Receivables

Latest receivables for CMLFU: $77M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$76.93M
67.30% YoYΔ $30.95M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) Receivables History

Loading

Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) (CMLFU) FAQ

Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) posts a receivables of $77M as of March 2026. That compares with $46M in the prior-year period — up 67.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War)'s receivables was $46M. The latest reading is $77M — a 67.3% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War)'s financial statement story. At $77M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CMLFU's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sema4 Holdings - Units (1 Ord Share Class A & 1/3 War) against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $77M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.