BackCH. Karnchang Public Company Limited Overview

CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited Receivables

Latest receivables for CK.BK: $11B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$10.50B
↓ 17.31% YoYΔ $-2.20B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited Receivables History

Loading

CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited (CK.BK) FAQ

CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited posts a receivables of $11B as of June 2026. That compares with $13B in the prior-year period — down 17.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited's receivables was $13B. The latest reading is $11B — a 17.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited's financial statement story. At $11B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CK.BK's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging CH. Karnchang Public Company Limited against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $11B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.