BackCIT Group Overview

CIT Group Total Liabilities

Track CIT Group's total liabilities ($48B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$48.25B
↓ 12.44% YoYΔ $-6.86B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

CIT Group Total Liabilities History

Loading

CIT Group vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

CIT Group Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

CIT Group (CIT) FAQ

CIT Group posts a total liabilities of $48B as of September 2021. That compares with $55B in the prior-year period — down 12.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, CIT Group's total liabilities was $55B. The latest reading is $48B — a 12.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of CIT Group's financial statement story. At $48B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CIT's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; CIT Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging CIT Group against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $48B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.