BackChowChow Cloud International Ho Overview

ChowChow Cloud International Ho Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for CHOW: $29M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$29.26M
13.26% YoYΔ $-4.47M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

ChowChow Cloud International Ho Total Liabilities History

Loading

ChowChow Cloud International Ho vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

ChowChow Cloud International Ho Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

ChowChow Cloud International Ho (CHOW) FAQ

ChowChow Cloud International Ho posts a total liabilities of $29M as of December 2025. That compares with $34M in the prior-year period — down 13.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, ChowChow Cloud International Ho's total liabilities was $34M. The latest reading is $29M — a 13.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of ChowChow Cloud International Ho's financial statement story. At $29M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CHOW's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ChowChow Cloud International Ho's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ChowChow Cloud International Ho against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $29M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.