BackCrestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Overview

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Other Current Liabilities

Track Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's other current liabilities ($170M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$168.10M
23.17% YoYΔ $-50.70M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit (CEQP) FAQ

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit posts a other current liabilities of $170M as of September 2023. That compares with $220M in the prior-year period — down 23.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's other current liabilities was $220M. The latest reading is $170M — a 23.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $170M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CEQP's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $170M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.