BackCrestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Overview

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Accounts Payable

Track Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's accounts payable ($260M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$256.90M
33.48% YoYΔ $-129.30M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Accounts Payable History

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit (CEQP) FAQ

Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit posts a accounts payable of $260M as of September 2023. That compares with $390M in the prior-year period — down 33.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's accounts payable was $390M. The latest reading is $260M — a 33.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $260M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CEQP's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Crestwood Equity Partners LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $260M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.