BackCypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit Overview

Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit Net Tangible Assets

Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit's net tangible assets is $35M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$34.56M
27.86% YoYΔ $-13.35M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit (CELP) FAQ

Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit posts a net tangible assets of $35M as of December 2021. That compares with $48M in the prior-year period — down 27.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit's net tangible assets was $48M. The latest reading is $35M — a 27.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit's financial statement story. At $35M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CELP's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Cypress Environmental Partners L.P. - Unit against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $35M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.