BackCelsius Holdings Overview

Celsius Holdings Total Current Liabilities

Track Celsius Holdings's total current liabilities ($1.1B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$1.05B
151.60% YoYΔ $633.48M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Celsius Holdings Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Celsius Holdings vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Celsius Holdings Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Celsius Holdings (CELH) FAQ

Celsius Holdings posts a total current liabilities of $1.1B as of March 2026. That compares with $420M in the prior-year period — up 151.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Celsius Holdings's total current liabilities was $420M. The latest reading is $1.1B — a 151.6% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Celsius Holdings's financial statement story. At $1.1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CELH's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Celsius Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Celsius Holdings against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.