BackComcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 Overview

Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 Receivables

Latest receivables for CCZ: $14B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$13.96B
7.02% YoYΔ $915.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 Receivables History

Loading

Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 (CCZ) FAQ

Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 posts a receivables of $14B as of June 2026. That compares with $13B in the prior-year period — up 7.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52's receivables was $13B. The latest reading is $14B — a 7.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52's financial statement story. At $14B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CCZ's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Comcast Holdings - FR DB REDEEM 15/10/2029 USD 71.52 against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $14B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.