BackCMC Materials Overview

CMC Materials Other Liabilities

Track CMC Materials's other liabilities ($84M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Liabilities
$84.43M
↓ 4.59% YoYΔ $-4.06M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

CMC Materials Other Liabilities History

Loading

CMC Materials vs. peers: Other Liabilities Comparison

Loading

CMC Materials Other Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

CMC Materials (CCMP) FAQ

CMC Materials posts a other liabilities of $84M as of March 2022. That compares with $88M in the prior-year period — down 4.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, CMC Materials's other liabilities was $88M. The latest reading is $84M — a 4.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Liabilities is one piece of CMC Materials's financial statement story. At $84M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CCMP's other liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; CMC Materials's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging CMC Materials against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in other liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $84M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.