BackCSI Compressco LP - Units Overview

CSI Compressco LP - Units Total Current Liabilities

CSI Compressco LP - Units's total current liabilities is $70M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$70.37M
16.48% YoYΔ $-13.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

CSI Compressco LP - Units Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

CSI Compressco LP - Units vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

CSI Compressco LP - Units Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

CSI Compressco LP - Units (CCLP) FAQ

CSI Compressco LP - Units posts a total current liabilities of $70M as of December 2023. That compares with $84M in the prior-year period — down 16.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, CSI Compressco LP - Units's total current liabilities was $84M. The latest reading is $70M — a 16.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of CSI Compressco LP - Units's financial statement story. At $70M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CCLP's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; CSI Compressco LP - Units's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging CSI Compressco LP - Units against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $70M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.