BackCryo-Cell International Overview

Cryo-Cell International Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for CCEL: $16M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$15.93M
26.77% YoYΔ $-5.82M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Cryo-Cell International Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Cryo-Cell International vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Cryo-Cell International Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Cryo-Cell International (CCEL) FAQ

Cryo-Cell International posts a total current liabilities of $16M as of May 2026. That compares with $22M in the prior-year period — down 26.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Cryo-Cell International's total current liabilities was $22M. The latest reading is $16M — a 26.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Cryo-Cell International's financial statement story. At $16M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CCEL's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Cryo-Cell International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Cryo-Cell International against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $16M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.