BackCommonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A Overview

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A Total Liabilities

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A's total liabilities is $1.3T.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$1331.50B
7.96% YoYΔ $98.19B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A Total Liabilities History

Loading

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A (CBAUY) FAQ

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A posts a total liabilities of $1.3T as of December 2025. That compares with $1.2T in the prior-year period — up 8.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A's total liabilities was $1.2T. The latest reading is $1.3T — a 8.0% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A's financial statement story. At $1.3T, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CBAUY's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Commonwealth Bank of Australia - GDR - 144A against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.3T here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.