BackCass Information Systems Overview

Cass Information Systems Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for CASS: $80M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$80.00M
92.28% YoYΔ $-956.79M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Cass Information Systems Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Cass Information Systems vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Cass Information Systems Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Cass Information Systems (CASS) FAQ

Cass Information Systems posts a total current liabilities of $80M as of June 2026. That compares with $1B in the prior-year period — down 92.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Cass Information Systems's total current liabilities was $1B. The latest reading is $80M — a 92.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Cass Information Systems's financial statement story. At $80M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CASS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Cass Information Systems's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Cass Information Systems against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $80M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.