BackBTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) Overview

BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for BTRSW: $250M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$251.78M
21.43% YoYΔ $-68.69M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) (BTRSW) FAQ

BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) posts a net tangible assets of $250M as of September 2022. That compares with $320M in the prior-year period — down 21.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026)'s net tangible assets was $320M. The latest reading is $250M — a 21.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026)'s financial statement story. At $250M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BTRSW's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging BTRS Holdings- Warrants (12/01/2026) against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $250M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.