BackBIT Mining Overview

BIT Mining Receivables

BIT Mining's receivables is $2.8M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$2.78M
↓ 91.66% YoYΔ $-30.58M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

BIT Mining Receivables History

Loading

BIT Mining vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

BIT Mining Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

BIT Mining (BTCM) FAQ

BIT Mining (BTCM) currently reports a receivables of $2.8M as of June 2025. That compares with $33M in the prior-year period — down 91.7% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore BIT Mining's receivables history and peer comparisons.

BIT Mining's receivables decreased from $33M to $2.8M — a 91.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2025). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

BIT Mining reported $2.8M in receivables as of June 2025. That compares with $33M in the prior-year period — down 91.7% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $2.8M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for BIT Mining, and consider following BTCM for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

BIT Mining is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On receivables, it currently shows $2.8M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing BTCM with unrelated industries.