BackBlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust Overview

BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust Profit Margin

Latest profit margin for BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust: 148.85% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Profit Margin

203.83%
67.81% YoY

As of Dec 2025

Annual Profit Margin (TTM)

148.85%
58.55% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Dec 2025

Average Profit Margin (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Profit Margin History

Loading

Profit Margin Comparison

Loading

Annual Profit Margin Growth Rate (%)

Loading

BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) FAQ

BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust's profit margin stands at 148.85% as of December 2025. That compares with 359.08% in the prior-year period — down 58.5% year over year. That is above the sector sector average of 21.44%. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust reported 148.85% in profit margin versus 359.08% a year earlier — a 58.5% year-over-year decrease. The historical chart on this page makes it easier to see whether that move is part of a longer pattern.

BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust sits higher the its sector benchmark (21.44%) with a profit margin of 148.85%. That is roughly 594.4% above the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

A profit margin of 148.85% for BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust means each unit of related capital or sales is generating that return rate. Higher is usually better for profitability metrics, but extremely high figures can reflect one-time items or thin equity bases. Review several years of data on this page before extrapolating.

The history chart shows how BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust's profit margin evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places BSTZ next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.