BackBluerock Residential Growth REIT Overview

Bluerock Residential Growth REIT Receivables

Track Bluerock Residential Growth REIT's receivables ($23M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$23.12M
86.04% YoYΔ $-142.54M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Bluerock Residential Growth REIT Receivables History

Loading

Bluerock Residential Growth REIT vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Bluerock Residential Growth REIT Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Bluerock Residential Growth REIT (BRG) FAQ

Bluerock Residential Growth REIT posts a receivables of $23M as of June 2022. That compares with $170M in the prior-year period — down 86.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Bluerock Residential Growth REIT's receivables was $170M. The latest reading is $23M — a 86.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Bluerock Residential Growth REIT's financial statement story. At $23M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BRG's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Bluerock Residential Growth REIT's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Bluerock Residential Growth REIT against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $23M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.