BackB.O.S. Better Online Solutions Overview

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Net Tangible Assets

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions's net tangible assets is $29M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$29.48M
27.88% YoYΔ $6.43M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions (BOSC) FAQ

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions posts a net tangible assets of $29M as of March 2026. That compares with $23M in the prior-year period — up 27.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions's net tangible assets was $23M. The latest reading is $29M — a 27.9% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of B.O.S. Better Online Solutions's financial statement story. At $29M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BOSC's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; B.O.S. Better Online Solutions's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging B.O.S. Better Online Solutions against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $29M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.