BackBank of Commerce Holdings Overview

Bank of Commerce Holdings Other Current Assets

Track Bank of Commerce Holdings's other current assets ($-740M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Assets
$-735.77M
81.08% YoYΔ $-329.44M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Bank of Commerce Holdings Other Current Assets History

Loading

Bank of Commerce Holdings vs. peers: Other Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Bank of Commerce Holdings Other Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Bank of Commerce Holdings (BOCH) FAQ

Bank of Commerce Holdings posts a other current assets of $-740M as of June 2021. That compares with $-410M in the prior-year period — down 81.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Bank of Commerce Holdings's other current assets was $-410M. The latest reading is $-740M — a 81.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Assets is one piece of Bank of Commerce Holdings's financial statement story. At $-740M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BOCH's other current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Bank of Commerce Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Bank of Commerce Holdings against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current assets easier to interpret. Start with $-740M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.