BackBiodelivery Sciences International Overview

Biodelivery Sciences International Receivables

Biodelivery Sciences International's receivables is $57M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$56.87M
18.10% YoYΔ $8.72M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Biodelivery Sciences International Receivables History

Loading

Biodelivery Sciences International vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Biodelivery Sciences International Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Biodelivery Sciences International (BDSI) FAQ

Biodelivery Sciences International posts a receivables of $57M as of December 2021. That compares with $48M in the prior-year period — up 18.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Biodelivery Sciences International's receivables was $48M. The latest reading is $57M — a 18.1% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Biodelivery Sciences International's financial statement story. At $57M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BDSI's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Biodelivery Sciences International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Biodelivery Sciences International against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $57M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.