BackBlonder Tongue Laboratories Overview

Blonder Tongue Laboratories Current Assets

Track Blonder Tongue Laboratories's current assets ($3.8M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$3.76M
↓ 27.46% YoYΔ $-1.42M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Blonder Tongue Laboratories Current Assets History

Loading

Blonder Tongue Laboratories vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Blonder Tongue Laboratories Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Blonder Tongue Laboratories (BDRLQ) FAQ

Blonder Tongue Laboratories posts a current assets of $3.8M as of March 2025. That compares with $5.2M in the prior-year period — down 27.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Blonder Tongue Laboratories's current assets was $5.2M. The latest reading is $3.8M — a 27.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Blonder Tongue Laboratories's financial statement story. At $3.8M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BDRLQ's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Blonder Tongue Laboratories's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Blonder Tongue Laboratories against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $3.8M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.