BackNeighborhood Intelligence Warrants Overview

Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants Goodwill

Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants's goodwill is $2.5M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$2.45M
↓ 60.21% YoYΔ $-3.71M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants Goodwill History

Loading

Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants (BBBYW) FAQ

Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants posts a goodwill of $2.5M as of June 2026. That compares with $6.2M in the prior-year period — down 60.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants's goodwill was $6.2M. The latest reading is $2.5M — a 60.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants's financial statement story. At $2.5M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BBBYW's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Neighborhood Intelligence Warrants against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $2.5M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.