BackAscena Retail Group Overview

Ascena Retail Group Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for ASNAQ: $800M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$798.20M
10.39% YoYΔ $-92.50M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Ascena Retail Group Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Ascena Retail Group vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Ascena Retail Group Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Ascena Retail Group (ASNAQ) FAQ

Ascena Retail Group posts a total current liabilities of $800M as of August 2019. That compares with $890M in the prior-year period — down 10.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Ascena Retail Group's total current liabilities was $890M. The latest reading is $800M — a 10.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending August 2019). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Ascena Retail Group's financial statement story. At $800M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ASNAQ's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Ascena Retail Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Ascena Retail Group against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $800M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.