BackASML Holding NV - New York Shares Overview

ASML Holding NV - New York Shares Total Assets

ASML Holding NV - New York Shares's total assets is $50B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Assets
$50.21B
11.96% YoYΔ $5.37B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

ASML Holding NV - New York Shares Total Assets History

Loading

ASML Holding NV - New York Shares vs. peers: Total Assets Comparison

Loading

ASML Holding NV - New York Shares Total Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

ASML Holding NV - New York Shares (ASML) FAQ

ASML Holding NV - New York Shares posts a total assets of $50B as of June 2026. That compares with $45B in the prior-year period — up 12.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, ASML Holding NV - New York Shares's total assets was $45B. The latest reading is $50B — a 12.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Assets is one piece of ASML Holding NV - New York Shares's financial statement story. At $50B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ASML's total assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ASML Holding NV - New York Shares's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ASML Holding NV - New York Shares against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total assets easier to interpret. Start with $50B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.