BackAlliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit Overview

Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit Current Cash

Latest current cash for ARLP: $110M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Cash
$111.19M
99.80% YoYΔ $-54.89B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit Current Cash History

Loading

Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit vs. peers: Current Cash Comparison

Loading

Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit Cash Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit (ARLP) FAQ

Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit posts a current cash of $110M as of June 2026. That compares with $55B in the prior-year period — down 99.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit's current cash was $55B. The latest reading is $110M — a 99.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Cash is one piece of Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ARLP's current cash usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Alliance Resource Partners, LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in current cash easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.