BackAlexandria Real Estate Equities Overview

Alexandria Real Estate Equities Net Tangible Assets

Alexandria Real Estate Equities's net tangible assets is $19B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$19.36B
11.98% YoYΔ $-2.64B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Alexandria Real Estate Equities Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Alexandria Real Estate Equities vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Alexandria Real Estate Equities Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) FAQ

Alexandria Real Estate Equities posts a net tangible assets of $19B as of March 2026. That compares with $22B in the prior-year period — down 12.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Alexandria Real Estate Equities's net tangible assets was $22B. The latest reading is $19B — a 12.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Alexandria Real Estate Equities's financial statement story. At $19B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ARE's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Alexandria Real Estate Equities's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Alexandria Real Estate Equities against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $19B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.