BackPreferred Apartment Communities Overview

Preferred Apartment Communities Receivables

Track Preferred Apartment Communities's receivables ($110M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$109.47M
15.05% YoYΔ $-19.39M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Preferred Apartment Communities Receivables History

Loading

Preferred Apartment Communities vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Preferred Apartment Communities Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Preferred Apartment Communities (APTS) FAQ

Preferred Apartment Communities posts a receivables of $110M as of March 2022. That compares with $130M in the prior-year period — down 15.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Preferred Apartment Communities's receivables was $130M. The latest reading is $110M — a 15.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Preferred Apartment Communities's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for APTS's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Preferred Apartment Communities's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Preferred Apartment Communities against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.