BackAlaska Communications Systems Group Overview

Alaska Communications Systems Group Receivables

Alaska Communications Systems Group's receivables is $40M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$40.29M
24.35% YoYΔ $7.89M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Alaska Communications Systems Group Receivables History

Loading

Alaska Communications Systems Group vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Alaska Communications Systems Group Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Alaska Communications Systems Group (ALSK) FAQ

Alaska Communications Systems Group posts a receivables of $40M as of March 2021. That compares with $32M in the prior-year period — up 24.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Alaska Communications Systems Group's receivables was $32M. The latest reading is $40M — a 24.4% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Alaska Communications Systems Group's financial statement story. At $40M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ALSK's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Alaska Communications Systems Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Alaska Communications Systems Group against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $40M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.