BackApartment Income REIT Overview

Apartment Income REIT Net Tangible Assets

Track Apartment Income REIT's net tangible assets ($2.5B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$2.55B
10.11% YoYΔ $233.77M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Apartment Income REIT Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Apartment Income REIT vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Apartment Income REIT Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Apartment Income REIT (AIRC) FAQ

Apartment Income REIT posts a net tangible assets of $2.5B as of March 2024. That compares with $2.3B in the prior-year period — up 10.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Apartment Income REIT's net tangible assets was $2.3B. The latest reading is $2.5B — a 10.1% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Apartment Income REIT's financial statement story. At $2.5B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AIRC's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Apartment Income REIT's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Apartment Income REIT against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $2.5B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.