BackApplied Genetic Technologies Overview

Applied Genetic Technologies Current Cash

Track Applied Genetic Technologies's current cash ($34M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Cash
$34.24M
62.17% YoYΔ $-56.27M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Applied Genetic Technologies Current Cash History

Loading

Applied Genetic Technologies vs. peers: Current Cash Comparison

Loading

Applied Genetic Technologies Cash Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Applied Genetic Technologies (AGTC) FAQ

Applied Genetic Technologies posts a current cash of $34M as of September 2022. That compares with $91M in the prior-year period — down 62.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Applied Genetic Technologies's current cash was $91M. The latest reading is $34M — a 62.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Cash is one piece of Applied Genetic Technologies's financial statement story. At $34M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AGTC's current cash usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Applied Genetic Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Applied Genetic Technologies against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in current cash easier to interpret. Start with $34M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.