BackAgile Therapeutics Overview

Agile Therapeutics Total Current Liabilities

Track Agile Therapeutics's total current liabilities ($26M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$26.23M
71.32% YoYΔ $10.92M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Agile Therapeutics Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Agile Therapeutics vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Agile Therapeutics Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Agile Therapeutics (AGRX) FAQ

Agile Therapeutics posts a total current liabilities of $26M as of June 2024. That compares with $15M in the prior-year period — up 71.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Agile Therapeutics's total current liabilities was $15M. The latest reading is $26M — a 71.3% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Agile Therapeutics's financial statement story. At $26M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AGRX's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Agile Therapeutics's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Agile Therapeutics against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $26M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.