BackFederal Agricultural Mortgage Overview

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Receivables

Track Federal Agricultural Mortgage's receivables ($300M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$303.73M
15.57% YoYΔ $40.92M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Receivables History

Loading

Federal Agricultural Mortgage vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM.A) FAQ

Federal Agricultural Mortgage posts a receivables of $300M as of March 2026. That compares with $260M in the prior-year period — up 15.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Federal Agricultural Mortgage's receivables was $260M. The latest reading is $300M — a 15.6% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Federal Agricultural Mortgage's financial statement story. At $300M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AGM.A's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Federal Agricultural Mortgage's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Federal Agricultural Mortgage against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $300M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.