BackAerie Pharmaceuticals Overview

Aerie Pharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets

Track Aerie Pharmaceuticals's net tangible assets ($-160M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-163.98M
125.02% YoYΔ $-91.11M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Aerie Pharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Aerie Pharmaceuticals vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Aerie Pharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Aerie Pharmaceuticals (AERI) FAQ

Aerie Pharmaceuticals posts a net tangible assets of $-160M as of September 2022. That compares with $-73M in the prior-year period — down 125.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Aerie Pharmaceuticals's net tangible assets was $-73M. The latest reading is $-160M — a 125.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Aerie Pharmaceuticals's financial statement story. At $-160M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AERI's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Aerie Pharmaceuticals's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Aerie Pharmaceuticals against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-160M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.