BackAntelope Enterprise Holdings Overview

Antelope Enterprise Holdings Operating Income

Track Antelope Enterprise Holdings's operating income ($-88M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Operating Income

$-49314310.00

As of Sep 30, 2025

Annual Operating Income (TTM)

$-87539978.00
47.74% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Sep 30, 2025

Average Operating Income (Comparison Companies)

Operating Income History

Operating Income Comparison

Annual Operating Income Growth Rate (%)

Annual Operating Income Growth (Absolute)

Antelope Enterprise Holdings (AEHL) FAQ

Antelope Enterprise Holdings posts a operating income of $-88M as of September 2025. That compares with $-170M in the prior-year period — up 47.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Antelope Enterprise Holdings's operating income was $-170M. The latest reading is $-88M — a 47.7% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Operating Income is one piece of Antelope Enterprise Holdings's financial statement story. At $-88M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AEHL's operating income usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Antelope Enterprise Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Antelope Enterprise Holdings against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in operating income easier to interpret. Start with $-88M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.