BackAutomatic Data Processing Overview

Automatic Data Processing Accounts Payable

Track Automatic Data Processing's accounts payable ($160M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$162.50M
3.90% YoYΔ $-6.60M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Automatic Data Processing Accounts Payable History

Loading

Automatic Data Processing vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

Automatic Data Processing Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Automatic Data Processing (ADP) FAQ

Automatic Data Processing posts a accounts payable of $160M as of June 2026. That compares with $170M in the prior-year period — down 3.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Automatic Data Processing's accounts payable was $170M. The latest reading is $160M — a 3.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of Automatic Data Processing's financial statement story. At $160M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ADP's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Automatic Data Processing's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Automatic Data Processing against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $160M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.