BackAmerican Defense Systems Overview

American Defense Systems Total Liabilities

Track American Defense Systems's total liabilities ($2.6M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$2.56M
↓ 47.77% YoYΔ $-2.34M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

American Defense Systems Total Liabilities History

Loading

American Defense Systems vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

American Defense Systems Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

American Defense Systems (ADFS) FAQ

American Defense Systems posts a total liabilities of $2.6M as of September 2012. That compares with $4.9M in the prior-year period — down 47.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, American Defense Systems's total liabilities was $4.9M. The latest reading is $2.6M — a 47.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2012). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of American Defense Systems's financial statement story. At $2.6M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ADFS's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; American Defense Systems's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging American Defense Systems against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $2.6M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.