BackACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027) Overview

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027) EBIT

Latest ebit for ACEVW: $-38M, below the Technology sector average of $12T.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly EBIT

-$6.13M
42.19% YoY

As of Mar 31, 2023

Annual EBIT (TTM)

-$38.32M

Trailing 12 months ending Mar 31, 2023

Average EBIT (Comparison Companies)

EBIT History

EBIT Comparison

Annual EBIT Growth Rate (%)

Annual EBIT Growth (Absolute)

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027) (ACEVW) FAQ

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027) (ACEVW) currently reports a EBIT of $-38M as of March 2023. That is below the Technology sector average of $12T. Use the charts on this page to explore ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027)'s EBIT history and peer comparisons.

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027)'s EBIT of $-38M is lower than the Technology sector average of $12T. That is roughly 100.0% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027) reported $-38M in EBIT as of March 2023. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current EBIT of $-38M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Technology average is $12T. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027), and consider following ACEVW for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Warrants (30/09/2027) is classified in the Technology sector. On EBIT, it currently shows $-38M versus a sector average near $12T. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing ACEVW with unrelated industries.