BackACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) Overview

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) Receivables

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War)'s receivables is $2.4M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$2.38M

Peer average

Loading

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) Receivables History

Loading

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) (ACEVU) FAQ

ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) posts a receivables of $2.4M as of March 2023. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War)'s receivables was $0. The latest reading is $2.4M (period ending March 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War)'s financial statement story. At $2.4M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ACEVU's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ACE Convergence Acquisition - Units (1 Ord Class A & 1/2 War) against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $2.4M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.