BackAccel Entertainment Overview

Accel Entertainment Other Current Liabilities

Track Accel Entertainment's other current liabilities ($41M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$40.70M
57.82% YoYΔ $-55.79M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Accel Entertainment Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Accel Entertainment vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Accel Entertainment Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Accel Entertainment (ACEL) FAQ

Accel Entertainment posts a other current liabilities of $41M as of March 2026. That compares with $96M in the prior-year period — down 57.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Accel Entertainment's other current liabilities was $96M. The latest reading is $41M — a 57.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Accel Entertainment's financial statement story. At $41M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ACEL's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Accel Entertainment's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Accel Entertainment against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $41M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.