BackATI AirTest Technologies Overview

ATI AirTest Technologies Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for AATGF: $-5M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-5.02M
16.04% YoYΔ $-693220.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

ATI AirTest Technologies Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

ATI AirTest Technologies vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

ATI AirTest Technologies Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

ATI AirTest Technologies (AATGF) FAQ

ATI AirTest Technologies posts a net tangible assets of $-5M as of September 2024. That compares with $-4.3M in the prior-year period — down 16.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, ATI AirTest Technologies's net tangible assets was $-4.3M. The latest reading is $-5M — a 16.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of ATI AirTest Technologies's financial statement story. At $-5M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AATGF's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ATI AirTest Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ATI AirTest Technologies against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-5M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.