BackArlington Asset Investment Overview

Arlington Asset Investment Accounts Payable

Track Arlington Asset Investment's accounts payable ($420K) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$422574.00
33.84% YoYΔ $-216185.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Arlington Asset Investment Accounts Payable History

Loading

Arlington Asset Investment vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

Arlington Asset Investment Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Arlington Asset Investment (AAIC) FAQ

Arlington Asset Investment posts a accounts payable of $420K as of March 2025. That compares with $640K in the prior-year period — down 33.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Arlington Asset Investment's accounts payable was $640K. The latest reading is $420K — a 33.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of Arlington Asset Investment's financial statement story. At $420K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AAIC's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Arlington Asset Investment's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Arlington Asset Investment against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $420K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.