BackGreenyn Biotechnology , Ltd Overview

Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd Intangible Assets

Latest intangible assets for 6846.TWO: $2.9M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$2.94M
↓ 21.40% YoYΔ $-799000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd Intangible Assets History

Loading

Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd (6846.TWO) FAQ

Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd posts a intangible assets of $2.9M as of June 2026. That compares with $3.7M in the prior-year period — down 21.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd's intangible assets was $3.7M. The latest reading is $2.9M — a 21.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd's financial statement story. At $2.9M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 6846.TWO's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Greenyn Biotechnology , Ltd against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $2.9M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.