BackFlight International , Ltd. Overview

Flight International , Ltd. Receivables

Track Flight International , Ltd.'s receivables ($200M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$196.32M
↓ 4.73% YoYΔ $-9.75M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Flight International , Ltd. Receivables History

Loading

Flight International , Ltd. vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Flight International , Ltd. Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Flight International , Ltd. (6798.TWO) FAQ

Flight International , Ltd. posts a receivables of $200M as of June 2026. That compares with $210M in the prior-year period — down 4.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Flight International , Ltd.'s receivables was $210M. The latest reading is $200M — a 4.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Flight International , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $200M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 6798.TWO's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Flight International , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Flight International , Ltd. against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $200M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.