BackChunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. Overview

Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for 6510.TWO: $11B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$10.65B
↑ 25.54% YoYΔ $2.17B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. (6510.TWO) FAQ

Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. posts a net tangible assets of $11B as of September 2026. That compares with $8.5B in the prior-year period — up 25.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd.'s net tangible assets was $8.5B. The latest reading is $11B — a 25.5% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $11B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 6510.TWO's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Chunghwa Precision Test Tech. , Ltd. against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $11B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.