BackASolid Technology , Ltd. Overview

ASolid Technology , Ltd. Accounts Payable

Track ASolid Technology , Ltd.'s accounts payable ($280M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$277.79M
↑ 118.50% YoYΔ $150.66M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

ASolid Technology , Ltd. Accounts Payable History

Loading

ASolid Technology , Ltd. vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

ASolid Technology , Ltd. Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

ASolid Technology , Ltd. (6485.TWO) FAQ

ASolid Technology , Ltd. posts a accounts payable of $280M as of June 2026. That compares with $130M in the prior-year period — up 118.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, ASolid Technology , Ltd.'s accounts payable was $130M. The latest reading is $280M — a 118.5% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of ASolid Technology , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $280M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 6485.TWO's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ASolid Technology , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ASolid Technology , Ltd. against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $280M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.