BackFsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials Overview

Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials Receivables

Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials's receivables is $47M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$47.26M
↑ 0.01% YoYΔ $3299.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials Receivables History

Loading

Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials (605318.SS) FAQ

Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials posts a receivables of $47M as of June 2026. That compares with $47M in the prior-year period — up 0.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials's receivables was $47M. The latest reading is $47M — essentially flat versus a year earlier (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials's financial statement story. At $47M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 605318.SS's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Fsilon Furnishing and Construction Materials against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $47M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.