BackJiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. Overview

Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. Current Assets

Latest current assets for 603937.SS: $1.4B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$1.35B
↓ 0.33% YoYΔ $-4.46M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. Current Assets History

Loading

Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. (603937.SS) FAQ

Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. posts a current assets of $1.4B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.4B in the prior-year period — down 0.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd.'s current assets was $1.4B. The latest reading is $1.4B — a 0.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $1.4B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 603937.SS's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Jiangsu Lidao New Materials , Ltd. against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.4B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.