BackChina Communications Construction Company Limited Overview

China Communications Construction Company Limited Receivables

Latest receivables for 601800.SS: $480B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$475.37B
↑ 2.12% YoYΔ $9.86B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

China Communications Construction Company Limited Receivables History

Loading

China Communications Construction Company Limited vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

China Communications Construction Company Limited Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Communications Construction Company Limited (601800.SS) FAQ

China Communications Construction Company Limited posts a receivables of $480B as of June 2026. That compares with $470B in the prior-year period — up 2.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Communications Construction Company Limited's receivables was $470B. The latest reading is $480B — a 2.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of China Communications Construction Company Limited's financial statement story. At $480B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 601800.SS's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Communications Construction Company Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Communications Construction Company Limited against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $480B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.